 Our letters to the telemarketing industry and federal / state regulators |
 |
|
Our letters to the telemarketing industry and federal / state regulators |
|
| 6/15/98 | To: American Telemarketing
Association Re: They misunderstand telemarketing laws, and mislead the public |
| 9/02/98 | To: DM News -
Letter-to-the-Editor Re: In response to a Libertarian's argument against the right of privacy |
| 9/03/98 | To: The Federal Communications
Commission Re: Their evident error in interpreting federal telemarketing law |
| 9/04/98 | To: TeleProfessional Magazine -
Letter-to-the-Editor Re: The sad quality of telemarketing industry leaders |
| 4/16/01 | To: The Federal Communications
Commission Re: They promote lies promulgated by the Direct Marketing Assn. |
| 4/16/01 | To: Director, Office of Managment &
Budget
and Office of the President Re: The need to fill the position of Chief Privacy Counsel at the OMB |
| 3/25/02 | To: The California Public
Utilities
Commission Re: Our comments concerning the regulation of telemarketing hang-up calls / predictive dialers |
| 4/11/02 |
To: Federal Trade Commission Re: Our comments on a national do-not-call list, then under consideration by the FTC. The FTC asked us to, and we did participate on its Washington, DC do-not-call panel (transcript). |
| 12/09/02 |
To: Federal Communications
Commission Re: Our comments on a national do-not-call list, then under consideration by the FCC. |
| 1/09/03 |
To: Federal Communications
Commission Re: Our comments concerning the comments of WorldCom. |
| Insight Magazine: Symposium - Should government protect your dinner hour from annoying telemarketers? Yes: A house is not a home when surveyors and telemarketers call. |
|
| 8/21/03 |
To: Federal Communications
Commission Re: Our comments concerning the FCC's ruling to allow radio-TV junk calls |
| To: Editor - Direct Magazine Re: Response to an article dismissing privacy advocates |
|
| 5/01/07 |
To:
Department of Homeland Security Re: In opposition to the implementation of the REAL ID Act |